Consider using the asset description instead of the file name when publishing release assets to GitLab #128
Description
The use case is at #127 :
Human-readable description used as a package name, which is meant to be more like filename than description. With that limitation I cannot set nice looking asset name:
Compare this to Nyx own release page on GH:
Each release using filename for upload and description to describe that file. With description-as-a-filename I forced to label my assets just like filename, although GitLab allows to put anything I want (not kitty-0.1.1.zip, but Kitty 0.1.1 distribution for Windows for example). So I still believe that's a mistake and asset name should be used instead for package name, and asset description should be used as asset link title on GL.
Basically, if I enrich Nyx's own config to publish to GL it will fail, although it works for GH.
Consistency with other release puboishing must be checked before applying the change.