-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 919
GODRIVER-1969 Use the unified spec test runner for GridFS tests. #1121
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
matthewdale
merged 3 commits into
mongodb:master
from
matthewdale:godriver1969-gridfs-unified-spec
Nov 10, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2f1e9d5
GODRIVER-1969 Use the unified spec test runner for GridFS tests.
matthewdale 7fac490
Update mongo/integration/unified/gridfs_bucket_operation_execution.go
matthewdale 1593bf2
Use a skipTestError instead of the skippedTestDescriptions for unsupp…
matthewdale File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the difference between
ErrWrongIndexandErrWrongSize?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Our documentation says:
ErrWrongIndexseems more accurate in this situation thanErrWrongSize. I could also see an argument for a new error type, something likeErrMissingChunks.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree that the error name/description is kinda confusing and an
ErrMissingChunkwould be more clear. However, since it's caused by the same issue whereErrWrongIndexis currently used (i.e. a chunk is missing), I decided it was better to use the same error so any existing error checking code would continue working.I originally decided to use
ErrWrongIndexbecause the unified spec test describing the error it's expecting as "ChunkIsMissing". In the Go Driver, there isn't a "ChunkIsMissing" error, but the current spec test runner maps "ChunkIsMissing" toErrWrongIndex.I think we should use
ErrWrongIndexin both cases, but maybe we can/should update the error message? Something like:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Using
ErrWrongIndexSGTM, but I'm hesitant to change the message forErrWrongIndexin case users are checking for the current message. That said, GridFS does not get much usage, and most users would probably do something likeerrors.Is(err, gridfs.ErrWrongIndex), anyway, so up to you.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll leave it as-is and add a proposal to the Go Driver 2.0 scope to rename and/or update the description of the error.