Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/#1140 host logging enhancement optimizations #570

Conversation

rmothilal
Copy link
Contributor

recent merge from master

DonChangfoot and others added 7 commits January 9, 2020 09:15
* feat: added authorization endpoints

* refactor: register only base authorization url

* feat: add transaction endpoint type to seeds

* chore: update populateTestData script

* add authorization and transaction endpoints

* chore: bump to 8.7.1

* update deps

* refactor: transaction requests callback url

* change to FSPIOP_CALLBACK_URL_TRX_REQ_SERVICE

* chore: update deps and bump version

* chore: rollback to 8.8.1
* 602 Catbox memory cache moved from hapi endpoints to standalone

* 602 catbox code adjusted

* 602 used direct cache call for all getEnums()

* 602 minor code adjustment (let to const)

* 602 fixed existing unit tests

* 602 implemented unit tests for cache
* 602 participants caching - initial implementation

* 602 participants caching - unit tests fixed

* 602 participants caching - new unit tests implemented

* 602 participants caching - integration tests fixed

* 602 participants caching - unit tests fixed

* 602 participants caching - added unit test for cache invalidation

* 602 participants caching - updated configs

* 602 participants caching - fixed integration tests
…nto feature/#1140HostLoggingEnhancementOptimizations

# Conflicts:
#	package-lock.json
#	package.json
Copy link
Member

@ggrg ggrg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Happy

@rmothilal rmothilal merged commit 1d009e2 into mojaloop:feature/#1140HostLoggingEnhancementOptimizations Jan 24, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants