revert: native federation typescript original behaviour #2428
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: c4e3da4 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
✅ Deploy Preview for module-federation-docs ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
ilteoood
force-pushed
the
revert/nft-speedup
branch
from
825d9e6 to
40dd0b4
Compare
Co-authored-by: zhouxiao.shaw <zhouxiao.shaw@bytedance.com>
ilteoood
force-pushed
the
revert/nft-speedup
branch
from
40dd0b4 to
6cddb66
Compare
Contributor
Author
ScriptedAlchemy
approved these changes
May 4, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
After some benchmarks, I see that there are no gains doing it, so:
Revert of #2341