-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 0
Lehmer code #7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Lehmer code #7
Conversation
|
Tip 👮 Agentic pre-merge checks are now available in preview!Pro plan users can now enable pre-merge checks in their settings to enforce checklists before merging PRs.
Please see the documentation for more information. Example: reviews:
pre_merge_checks:
custom_checks:
- name: "Undocumented Breaking Changes"
mode: "warning"
instructions: |
Pass/fail criteria: All breaking changes to public APIs, CLI flags, environment variables, configuration keys, database schemas, or HTTP/GraphQL endpoints must be documented in the "Breaking Change" section of the PR description and in CHANGELOG.md. Exclude purely internal or private changes (e.g., code not exported from package entry points or explicitly marked as internal).Please share your feedback with us on this Discord post. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Free 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Note 🎁 Summarized by CodeRabbit FreeYour organization is on the Free plan. CodeRabbit will generate a high-level summary and a walkthrough for each pull request. For a comprehensive line-by-line review, please upgrade your subscription to CodeRabbit Pro by visiting https://app.coderabbit.ai/login. Comment |
53ca783 to
0339d4e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is the final PR Bugbot will review for you during this billing cycle.
Your free Bugbot reviews will reset on October 7
Details
You are on the Bugbot Free tier. On this plan, Bugbot will review limited PRs each billing cycle.
To receive Bugbot reviews on all of your PRs, please upgrade to Bugbot Pro by visiting the Cursor dashboard. Your first 14 days will be free!
| for i in range(len(ELEMENTS)): | ||
| permutation.append(ELEMENTS[rank % len(ELEMENTS)]) | ||
| rank //= len(ELEMENTS) | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Bug: Missing Return and Incorrect Validation
The unrank function implicitly returns None because it's missing a return statement for the permutation it computes. Additionally, its rank validation incorrectly uses len(ELEMENTS) ** len(ELEMENTS) as the upper bound instead of N_PERMUTATIONS (n!), which is not correct for Lehmer codes.
This change is
Summary by CodeRabbit