You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Reported by kproelss on 28 Mar 2010 19:46 UTC
Pressure drop and heat transfer correlations for turbulent and laminar pipe flow are added to Modelica.Fluid in MSL 3.2 with the new package Dissipation. In order to make them available as choices in the pipe models already existing in Modelica.Fluid several changes have to be made to these models. The main challenges are:
Current correlations combine pressure changes due to friction and to static head, while the dissipation correlations only cover friction losses.
All pressure drop or heat transfer choices require the same variable input (replaceable functions) or a common set of variable modifications (replaceable models).
All pressure drop or heat transfer choices require the same parameter input (replaceable functions) or parameter modifications are applied to the redeclared model (and disappear if another choice is made)
How can non-matching choice combinations be avoided, e.g. a two-phase pressure drop correlation and one-phase medium package?
Robustness at flow reversal
Redundant correlation choices must be avoided, while still maintaining backwards compatibility or at least conversion to equivalent physical behavior.
Reported by kproelss on 28 Mar 2010 19:46 UTC
Pressure drop and heat transfer correlations for turbulent and laminar pipe flow are added to
Modelica.Fluid
in MSL 3.2 with the new packageDissipation
. In order to make them available as choices in the pipe models already existing inModelica.Fluid
several changes have to be made to these models. The main challenges are:Migrated-From: https://trac.modelica.org/Modelica/ticket/344
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: