Skip to content

Conversation

HansOlsson
Copy link
Collaborator

Closes #3729
And also unify noEvent-handling:
I assume that the previous text was a bit odd since it talked about "event-generating" to avoid stating that it only applied when potentially generating events; I thus found it necessary to add a noEvent-context for the new text.

And unfortunately the noEvent-part had to be unified.

And also unify noEvent-handling:
I assume that the previous text was a bit odd since it talked about "event-generating" to avoid stating that it only applied outside of noEvent;
I thus found it necessary to add a noEvent-context for the new text.

And unfortunately the noEvent-part had to be unified.
@HansOlsson HansOlsson added this to the 2025-October milestone Oct 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Strange sentence about some event-generating operators
1 participant