Closed
Conversation
9 tasks
9d10730 to
1a876ca
Compare
StdioTransport support for Linux with musl
Replace os checks with canImport
453f702 to
2df70f8
Compare
9 tasks
Contributor
Author
|
Superseded by #151 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow up to #61
The Swift Static Linux SDK allows Swift code to be built as a fully statically linked executables. Notably, this allows a package to be usable in executables built for Alpine Linux, which uses musl instead of glibc.
The actual implementation (f3f4cfd) is, theoretically, straightforward — just another conditional compilation
#canImport. The tricky part has been testing this in CI. Because Swift isn't currently supported on Alpine Linux, we need to build an executable with the Swift Static Linux SDK in a separate job. However, this approach fails because of an apparent lack of support for Swift Testing:As a workaround, we can create an example binary executable and run that as a substitute for our test suite. But that's more than I want to bite off right now, so I'll convert this to draft for now.