Switch from yapf/pylint/isort to ruff #874
Draft
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR updates our codebase to use
ruff
for linting and formatting, replacingyapf
,pylint
, andisort
.ruff
offers the combined functionality of all three tools while being significantly faster.Previously, running
yapf
,pylint
, andisort
locally took ~1m 16s on my workstation.In contrast, running
ruff
took ~0.14s on my workstation.ruff check && ruff format --check
In GitHub Actions, the improvement is less dramatic due to tool installation times, but I observed roughly a 50% reduction in runtime.
Todo
ruff
code style. Due to slight differences in the code style ofruff
and our previous setup, the current checks fail. I will update this PR to include modifying the existing code to conform with the newruff
style.