-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 177
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(output): unifying execution of 'live' output handlers #459
feat(output): unifying execution of 'live' output handlers #459
Conversation
2679dbf
to
9bd4bde
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good! I like it thanks!
You might have some conflicts when merging with master
, since we have moved all the output_methods
in output.py
to a its own directory.
9bd4bde
to
444d63f
Compare
Indeed, I just rebased from master and re-dispatched the changes to the various output definitions. |
Seeing the output of the CI ==> There are 2 things @eledhwen :
|
5f7e615
to
8bfb56a
Compare
Done ✅ |
e9f7a5f
to
dda2b4f
Compare
… output management, rework BaseOutput with separate api contracts for live/cold/task calls
dda2b4f
to
69758cc
Compare
@inimaz I also fixed the impacted tests, it should be good to go now. |
@eledhwen Thanks for the feature! Looks good. |
Following-up on discussion in #458