Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

construct #53

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 11, 2024
Merged

construct #53

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 11, 2024

Conversation

PhilipDeegan
Copy link
Member

@PhilipDeegan PhilipDeegan commented Aug 11, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a constructor for BonParsableNode, enhancing object initialization flexibility.
    • Improved the clarity and type safety of the emplace_back method's return type.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Reorganized member variable declarations for better clarity and maintenance.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 11, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a constructor to the BonParsableNode struct, enhancing its initialization flexibility. The emplace_back method's return type is clarified for better type safety. Additionally, member variable declarations are reorganized for improved readability, all while maintaining the original functionality. These modifications collectively improve usability and clarity.

Changes

Files Change Summary
inc/mkn/kul/bon.hpp Added constructor for BonParsableNode with optional parameter; changed emplace_back return type; repositioned declarations for p and ss.

Poem

In fields of code where bunnies play,
A constructor hops in, brightening the day.
With clearer returns and members in line,
Usability blooms, and all is just fine!
So here’s to the changes, let joy be unfurled,
A happy little rabbit in a coding world! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c1bc117 and 8b95a3c.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • inc/mkn/kul/bon.hpp (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
inc/mkn/kul/bon.hpp (4)

53-53: Constructor addition enhances flexibility.

The addition of the constructor for BonParsableNode with an optional pointer parameter enhances the flexibility of object instantiation.


55-55: Improved type safety with explicit return type.

Changing the return type of emplace_back to BonParsableNode& enhances type safety and clarity.


57-57: Logical placement of member variable p.

The declaration of p after the constructor is consistent with its initialization logic and maintains clarity.


58-58: Consistent declaration of member variable ss.

The declaration of ss following p maintains a logical and consistent order of member variables.

@PhilipDeegan PhilipDeegan merged commit 2c54985 into master Aug 11, 2024
3 checks passed
@PhilipDeegan PhilipDeegan deleted the next branch August 11, 2024 15:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant