-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Engine Prime export uses libdjinterop snapshot API #3776
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Out of scope: Did you consider switching to GIT_REPOSITORY + GIT_TAG? I Just used this variant recently in a project and it seems to be more concise.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This did originally use
GIT_REPOSITORY
etc. but I changed it in a (sadly misguided) attempt to get the Ubuntu build working. I agree with you thatGIT_REPOSITORY
is more clear vs. a download link on GitHub. It's also easier during development to temporarily point to a branch (e.g. when I'm testing out a new version of libdjinterop that hasn't been merged yet).I'll make a note to change this back at some point!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#3779
I wasn't aware of the Debian/Ubuntu build dependencies. The Fedora build system requires you to manually upload and hash sources in advance.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is a more full discussion in #3620
In short, there was no need to change from
GIT_REPOSITORY
to plain old http downloads. The Ubuntu build should not be downloading sources of dependencies from GitHub, and should instead be using packages. To that end, libdjinterop now has its own PPA, and I either Mixxx's PPA can use the same packages, or make a dependency on the libdjinterop PPA.This reminds me to talk to Daniel about agreeing the approach, which I'll do on Zulip now.