Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@KaQuMiQ has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 16 minutes and 14 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
WalkthroughThe changes update the project version in the Possibly related PRs
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.claude/settings.json(1 hunks)pyproject.toml(1 hunks)src/draive/helpers/instruction_refinement.py(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.py`: Follow Ruff import ordering (standard library, third party, local) Us...
**/*.py: Follow Ruff import ordering (standard library, third party, local)
Use Python 3.12+ type features (type unions with |, generic syntax)
Use base and abstract types like Sequence or Iterable instead of concrete types
Use custom exceptions for specific errors
Format code with Ruff
Run linters (Ruff + Bandit + Pyright strict mode)
📄 Source: CodeRabbit Inference Engine (CLAUDE.md)
List of files the instruction was applied to:
src/draive/helpers/instruction_refinement.py
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: CR
PR: miquido/draive#0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-01T09:39:43.008Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.py : Format code with Ruff
pyproject.toml (3)
Learnt from: KaQuMiQ
PR: miquido/draive#338
File: src/draive/lmm/__init__.py:1-2
Timestamp: 2025-06-16T10:28:07.434Z
Learning: The draive project requires Python 3.12+ as specified in pyproject.toml with "requires-python = ">=3.12"" and uses Python 3.12+ specific features like PEP 695 type aliases and generic syntax extensively throughout the codebase.
Learnt from: CR
PR: miquido/draive#0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-01T09:39:43.008Z
Learning: Applies to draive/**/*.py : Use absolute imports from draive package
Learnt from: KaQuMiQ
PR: miquido/draive#327
File: src/draive/helpers/instruction_preparation.py:28-34
Timestamp: 2025-05-28T17:41:57.460Z
Learning: The draive project uses and requires Python 3.12+, so PEP-695 generic syntax with square brackets (e.g., `def func[T: Type]()`) is valid and should be used instead of the older TypeVar approach.
🔇 Additional comments (4)
pyproject.toml (1)
8-8: Version bump looks good.The version increment from 0.75.2 to 0.75.4 aligns with the refactoring changes in the instruction refinement module.
.claude/settings.json (1)
1-15: Automated formatting hook configuration looks good.This setup ensures consistent code formatting by automatically running
make formatafter write or edit operations. This aligns well with the project's code quality standards mentioned in the coding guidelines.src/draive/helpers/instruction_refinement.py (2)
575-620: Well-structured orchestration of the refactored strategy generation.The separation of metadata generation from content generation improves modularity and makes the process easier to understand and maintain. The validation logic appropriately handles edge cases with clear warnings.
441-620: Excellent refactoring of the instruction refinement logic.The separation of strategy metadata generation from content generation significantly improves code clarity and maintainability. This modular approach makes it easier to test, debug, and extend each component independently.
KaQuMiQ
force-pushed
the
feature/instructions_refine
branch
2 times, most recently
from
3fb8e3d to
74e961e
Compare
KaQuMiQ
force-pushed
the
feature/instructions_refine
branch
from
74e961e to
7c56cc0
Compare
1 participant
No description provided.