Add option for sagetex #13
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
`sage` aims to be an alternative to commercial programs such as Maple, Matlab, and Mathematica. `sagetex` is a package to include sage commands/expressions in TeX documents and doing calculations/plotting thereby. Using `sagetex` requires run `tex -> sage -> tex`. As this workflow is pretty similar to the one of biber/makeglossaries, we can implement it quite the same way. So this just checks if `sage` should be run (file with ext = `sage` found in `filelist` has changed) and if so, run `sage`.
|
Anything you can tell about the two points I mention? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
sageaims to be an alternative to commercial programs such as Maple, Matlab, and Mathematica.sagetexis a package to include sage commands/expressions in TeX documents and doing calculations/plotting thereby.Using
sagetexrequires runtex -> sage -> tex. As this workflow is pretty similar to the one of biber/makeglossaries, we can implement it quite the same way. So this just checks ifsageshould be run (file with ext =sagefound infilelisthas changed) and if so, runsage.To be discussed:
cluttex.luaformakeglossariesandbiberyou always touch the supposed output file. I'm not quite sure why you do this, so I just didn't copy this. Maybe you can explain why you're doing this and maybe we should do this for sagetex as well.So again @minoki, what are your thoughts on this? (made this a draft again to first discuss these points)