Skip to content

Refactor recogniton data pipeline #430

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Jun 27, 2023

Conversation

zhtmike
Copy link
Collaborator

@zhtmike zhtmike commented Jun 20, 2023

Adapt the recognition using the new pipeline.

  1. Evaluation Part Verification [7 models, Done]
  2. Training Part Verification [3 models, Done]
  3. Performance benchmark [Doing]

Thank you for your contribution to the MindOCR repo.
Before submitting this PR, please make sure:

Motivation

(Write your motivation for proposed changes here.)

Test Plan

(How should this PR be tested? Do you require special setup to run the test or repro the fixed bug?)

Related Issues and PRs

(Is this PR part of a group of changes? Link the other relevant PRs and Issues here. Use https://help.github.com/en/articles/closing-issues-using-keywords for help on GitHub syntax)

@zhtmike zhtmike marked this pull request as ready for review June 27, 2023 08:17
@zhtmike zhtmike merged commit 778774a into mindspore-lab:refactor_dp Jun 27, 2023
@zhtmike zhtmike deleted the rec_db_refactor branch June 27, 2023 09:32
@hadipash hadipash mentioned this pull request Jul 6, 2023
4 tasks
hadipash added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2023
* Refactor recogniton data pipeline

* Fix deterioration args

* Fix transform

* remove duplicated

* merge PR #437

* Better name

* better name

* Fix SVTR transform

* fix svtr transform

* best setting for speed

* Fix the random in CVRescale

* better speed in inference

* remove _Compose class from augmentations

* move type checking inside `__init__`

* remove non data related change

---------

Co-authored-by: Rustam Khadipash <16683750+hadipash@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants