fix: ScoreBasedBalancer may balance more segments to new online querynode

[weiliu1031]

issue: #37651
this PR introduce two constriant to avoid balance too aggresive on new online querynode:

1. sort the collections with total row count, balance the largest collection first
2. add a data percent limit on the balance plan to single querynode, in case of move too much data to new node in one round.

[sre-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: weiliu1031
To complete the pull request process, please assign czs007 after the PR has been reviewed.
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @czs007 in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• internal/querycoordv2/balance/OWNERS
• internal/querycoordv2/checkers/OWNERS
• pkg/util/OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 68.07%. Comparing base (1304b40) to head (c95aaee).
Report is 231 commits behind head on master.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (1304b40) and HEAD (c95aaee). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE

Flag	BASE (1304b40)	HEAD (c95aaee)
	2	1

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #37652       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   80.57%   68.07%   -12.50%     
===========================================
  Files        1357      290     -1067     
  Lines      190448    25455   -164993     
===========================================
- Hits       153449    17328   -136121     
+ Misses      31588     8127    -23461     
+ Partials     5411        0     -5411     

Components	Coverage Δ
Client	∅ <ø> (∅)
Core	68.07% <ø> (ø)
Go	∅ <ø> (∅)

see 1067 files with indirect coverage changes

[mergify]

@weiliu1031 E2e jenkins job failed, comment /run-cpu-e2e can trigger the job again.