Implement neo pixel #55
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new gauge visualization in the firmware by replacing console logging with a visual gauge update. The changes include creating and initializing a new Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant P as Program.Main
participant G as NeoPixelGauge
participant GT as Gauge Thread
P->>G: Create gauge instance (45 pixels, [Green, Yellow, Red], pin 11)
P->>G: Initialize() → Starts GT
Note over GT: Continuously adjusts gauge position
P->>G: SetPosition(sensor value)
GT->>G: Update current position toward requested position
sequenceDiagram
participant BM as Benchmark Program
participant B3 as FrameworkBenchmark3
BM->>B3: Execute benchmark tests
B3->>BM: Run FillArray_Int32
B3->>BM: Run FillArray_UInt16
B3->>BM: Run FillArray_Int64
Possibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (11)
src/nf-telemetry-clients/Peripherals/NeoPixel.Peripheral/NeoPixelGauge.cs (5)
3-3: Consider partial namespaces or reorganizing using statements.The addition of
using System;is straightforward. If it’s only needed forMath, consider grouping all standard library references together to keep imports tidy.
22-22: Follow up on TODO.The comment suggests optimizing pulse transfer times. If this directly impacts performance, consider measuring actual timings and adjusting any hardware or driver-level parameters.
Do you want me to open a new issue or provide suggestions for diagnosing and optimizing pulse transfer rates?
47-47: Validate thread usage and naming consistency.Creating
_gaugeThreadwith the same method nameSetPositioncan confuse readers. Consider renaming the private loop method toGaugeWorkeror similar for clarity.- _gaugeThread = new Thread(SetPosition); + _gaugeThread = new Thread(GaugeWorker);
50-66: Consider providing a graceful shutdown option.
Initialize()sets the gauge thread into motion. There is no exposed mechanism to stop or dispose it gracefully if needed. Consider a cancellation token or a stopping method to avoid orphan threads.
73-138: Review infinite loop and concurrency design.
- The thread runs indefinitely with
_currentPositionupdates. Ensure you won’t starve other threads with frequentThread.Sleep(0). Consider yielding less frequently or balancing CPU usage more explicitly.- Up/down logic duplication can be refactored for maintainability (e.g., unify increments logic).
- Recheck offset updates to confirm pixel indexing is valid (e.g., not overshooting array bounds).
// Example: unify logic for going up/down to reduce duplication.src/nf-telemetry-clients/Shared/Tests/Client.Services.Benchmarks/FrameworkBenchmark2.cs (4)
18-21: Consider using consistent loop variable names across methodsThe loop variable here is named 'j', while in FrameworkBenchmark3.cs it's named 'i'. Consider standardizing on one naming convention for better readability and maintainability.
- for (int j = 0; j < until; j++) - { - array[j] = j; + for (int i = 0; i < until; i++) + { + array[i] = i;
28-31: Consider using consistent loop variable names across methodsSame comment as above - standardize loop variable naming.
- for (UInt16 j = 0; j < About65k; j++) - { - array[j] = j; + for (UInt16 i = 0; i < About65k; i++) + { + array[i] = i;
37-39: Consider using explicit casting for array sizeFor consistency with FillArray_Int32, consider casting About65k to Int64 when defining the array size variable.
- var until = (Int64)About65k; + var until = (Int64)About65k;
39-42: Consider using consistent loop variable names across methodsSame comment as above - standardize loop variable naming.
- for (long j = 0; j < until; j++) - { - array[j] = j; + for (long i = 0; i < until; i++) + { + array[i] = i;src/nf-telemetry-clients/Shared/Tests/Client.Services.Benchmarks/FrameworkBenchmark3.cs (2)
45-46: Use explicit casting for array size consistencyFor consistency with the Int32 implementation, consider explicitly casting About65k to Int64:
- var until = About65k; + var until = (Int64)About65k;
47-50: Consider using the 'until' variable in the loop conditionYou're creating the 'until' variable but then using 'About65k' directly in the loop condition. For consistency and to avoid potential bugs if the variables diverge:
- for (Int64 i = 0; i < About65k; i++) + for (Int64 i = 0; i < until; i++)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
src/nf-telemetry-clients/Clients/RipTide.Nfirmware/Program.cs(3 hunks)src/nf-telemetry-clients/Clients/RipTide.Nfirmware/RipTide.Nfirmware.nfproj(1 hunks)src/nf-telemetry-clients/Clients/RipTide.Nfirmware/packages.config(1 hunks)src/nf-telemetry-clients/Peripherals/NeoPixel.Peripheral/NeoPixelGauge.cs(2 hunks)src/nf-telemetry-clients/Shared/Tests/Client.Services.Benchmarks/Client.Services.Benchmarks.nfproj(1 hunks)src/nf-telemetry-clients/Shared/Tests/Client.Services.Benchmarks/FrameworkBenchmark2.cs(1 hunks)src/nf-telemetry-clients/Shared/Tests/Client.Services.Benchmarks/FrameworkBenchmark3.cs(1 hunks)src/nf-telemetry-clients/Shared/Tests/Client.Services.Benchmarks/Program.cs(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/nf-telemetry-clients/Shared/Tests/Client.Services.Benchmarks/Program.cs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (csharp)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
src/nf-telemetry-clients/Clients/RipTide.Nfirmware/packages.config (1)
4-4: Confirm the newly added package version.Adding "nanoFramework.Graphics.Core" v1.2.39 is fine, but it would be prudent to ensure that no critical security patches or major performance improvements exist in more recent versions.
Please run a quick check or consult the package release notes to confirm you’re on a suitable version.
src/nf-telemetry-clients/Clients/RipTide.Nfirmware/RipTide.Nfirmware.nfproj (1)
40-42: Validate reference path correctness.The newly added reference to nanoFramework.Graphics.Core appears correct. Ensure that the relative path is valid on all target build environments—especially if you use a CI pipeline that resolves packages in a different way.
src/nf-telemetry-clients/Clients/RipTide.Nfirmware/Program.cs (3)
1-3: Check naming consistency of imports.Imports for
NeoPixel.PeripheralandSystem.Drawingare newly added. Everything here appears correct. No issues found.
16-17: Initialize gauge carefully in startup sequence.Instantiating and initializing the gauge early is valid. However, confirm that calling
Initialize()immediately is suitable if other peripherals or concurrency aspects need to be ready first.
30-30: Ensure correct scaling of position values.
gauge.SetPosition(value)continuously updates, but confirm whether additional input validation is needed. Unexpected negative or overly large sensor outputs may cause unexpected gauge behavior.src/nf-telemetry-clients/Peripherals/NeoPixel.Peripheral/NeoPixelGauge.cs (1)
68-71: Ensure new positions remain in valid range.You already clamp
positionto_colors.Length - 1, which is good. Confirm negative inputs are also handled—currently, they remain as-is if < 0. Possibly clamp minimum to 0, if that’s intended.- _requestedPosition = Math.Min(position, _colors.Length-1); + _requestedPosition = Math.Max(0, Math.Min(position, _colors.Length-1));src/nf-telemetry-clients/Shared/Tests/Client.Services.Benchmarks/Client.Services.Benchmarks.nfproj (1)
23-24: Looks good - new benchmark files have been added to the projectThe new benchmark files are properly added to the compilation list in the project file.
src/nf-telemetry-clients/Shared/Tests/Client.Services.Benchmarks/FrameworkBenchmark2.cs (1)
7-9: Code looks good - benchmark class is properly configuredThe class is correctly decorated with the necessary benchmark attributes.
src/nf-telemetry-clients/Shared/Tests/Client.Services.Benchmarks/FrameworkBenchmark3.cs (1)
11-12: Verify if single iteration is sufficient for benchmarkingThis benchmark uses only 1 iteration, while FrameworkBenchmark2 uses 10. For more statistically significant results, consider increasing the iteration count, unless this is specifically designed to measure memory consumption with a single run.
src/nf-telemetry-clients/Peripherals/NeoPixel.Peripheral/NeoPixelGauge.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/nf-telemetry-clients/Shared/Tests/Client.Services.Benchmarks/FrameworkBenchmark3.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…xelGauge.cs Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Implement neo pixel
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores