Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: rename X40 classes #183

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jun 24, 2024
Merged

Conversation

chemelli74
Copy link
Member

@chemelli74 chemelli74 commented Jun 23, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Renamed device and message classes to improve consistency and readability.
    • Updated references to use a more descriptive device type enum.
    • Simplified and updated method implementations to enhance maintainability.

@chemelli74 chemelli74 added the breaking change A change that is not backwards compatible label Jun 23, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 23, 2024

Walkthrough

The codebase for the midealocal project was updated to rename several classes and update references to a device type enum. The changes primarily involved converting the class names and device type from a specific '40' identifier to a more descriptive 'X40' naming convention. This includes updates to device classes, message handling classes, and references throughout the codebase.

Changes

File/Path Change Summary
midealocal/devices/x40/__init__.py Renamed Midea40Device to MideaX40Device, updated device_type usage to DeviceType.X40, adjusted method implementations.
midealocal/devices/x40/message.py Renamed classes from Message40* to MessageX40*, updated device_type in constructors to DeviceType.X40.

Poem

In the realm of code, changes do unfold,
Classes renamed, their stories retold.
From Midea40 to X40 we now stride,
Device types redefined, changes far and wide.
With each update, our code grows bright,
In the digital fields, we take to flight.
🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jun 23, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 18 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 24.29%. Comparing base (fe5a325) to head (dfb8f36).

Files Patch % Lines
midealocal/devices/x40/__init__.py 0.00% 11 Missing ⚠️
midealocal/devices/x40/message.py 0.00% 7 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #183   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   24.29%   24.29%           
=======================================
  Files          78       78           
  Lines        6800     6799    -1     
=======================================
  Hits         1652     1652           
+ Misses       5148     5147    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 6

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
midealocal/devices/x40/message.py (1)

Line range hint 180-191: Review of MessageX40Response constructor.

The constructor uses the MessageType enumeration effectively and sets the body appropriately based on the message type. However, the method set_attr is called without being defined in the provided snippet.

Ensure that the set_attr method is implemented, or remove the call if it is not needed.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2f53134 and d69e987.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • midealocal/devices/x40/init.py (6 hunks)
  • midealocal/devices/x40/message.py (7 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
midealocal/devices/x40/__init__.py (2)

Line range hint 30-52: Review of class MideaX40Device constructor.

The constructor correctly initializes the MideaX40Device with the new DeviceType.X40. This aligns with the PR's goal of using enumerations for device types, enhancing readability and maintainability.


8-8: Use consistent import style.

It's a best practice to keep import styles consistent. Consider grouping all imports from midealocal.device together.

- from midealocal.device import DeviceType, MideaDevice
+ from midealocal.device import DeviceType
+ from midealocal.device import MideaDevice

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

midealocal/devices/x40/message.py (1)

Line range hint 11-22: Initialization of MessageX40Base.

Using DeviceType.X40 in the base class initialization ensures that all derived message types are consistently using the correct device type. This aligns with the PR's goals.

midealocal/devices/x40/__init__.py Show resolved Hide resolved
midealocal/devices/x40/__init__.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
midealocal/devices/x40/__init__.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
midealocal/devices/x40/__init__.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
midealocal/devices/x40/message.py Show resolved Hide resolved
midealocal/devices/x40/message.py Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
rokam
rokam previously approved these changes Jun 23, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d69e987 and e5a35fe.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • midealocal/devices/x40/init.py (6 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • midealocal/devices/x40/init.py

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e5a35fe and da28933.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • midealocal/devices/x40/init.py (6 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
midealocal/devices/x40/__init__.py (2)

143-143: Inheritance issue in MideaAppliance.

MideaAppliance inherits from MideaX40Device but is named as if it is a generic appliance class. This could lead to confusion if not all Midea appliances are of type X40.

Consider renaming MideaAppliance to GenericMideaAppliance or similar if it is intended to be more general, or documenting the specific nature of this inheritance.


Line range hint 30-52: Ensure proper initialization of new attributes.

The MideaX40Device class constructor has been updated to use DeviceType.X40. Make sure that all instances of this class are correctly initialized with the new device type.

midealocal/devices/x40/__init__.py Show resolved Hide resolved
midealocal/devices/x40/__init__.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@chemelli74 chemelli74 requested a review from rokam June 24, 2024 13:45
@rokam rokam merged commit a8b07d2 into midea-lan:main Jun 24, 2024
6 checks passed
@chemelli74 chemelli74 deleted the chemelli74-naming-fix branch June 24, 2024 16:06
@rokam rokam mentioned this pull request Jul 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
breaking change A change that is not backwards compatible
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants