Skip to content

Conversation

@fehmisener
Copy link

This PR updates the field comment for content_bytes to correctly describe its purpose. The comment previously stated that the value was Base64-encoded, but the field type (bytes) indicates it contains raw binary data.

Changes

  • Updated the comment to reflect that content_bytes holds raw bytes, not Base64-encoded content.

Reason for Change

The previous comment was misleading and inconsistent with the field’s type annotation. This correction improves clarity and helps prevent confusion for developers using or maintaining the code.

When base64 used instead, I was getting this error below:

APIError
Code: 400
ErrorRequiredPropertyMissing
message: 'Required property is missing.'

@fehmisener fehmisener requested a review from a team as a code owner October 11, 2025 16:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant