Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix single-tab window tear-off crash #17251

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 13, 2024
Merged

Fix single-tab window tear-off crash #17251

Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
50138cc
fix single tab window tear-off
tusharsnx May 12, 2024
d5050a5
what am I doing
tusharsnx May 12, 2024
d5a4376
do a null check on interactivity
tusharsnx May 13, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion src/cascadia/TerminalControl/TermControl.cpp
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1051,7 +1051,7 @@ namespace winrt::Microsoft::Terminal::Control::implementation
// MSFT 33353327: We're purposefully not using _initializedTerminal to ensure we're fully initialized.
// Doing so makes us return nullptr when XAML requests an automation peer.
// Instead, we need to give XAML an automation peer, then fix it later.
if (!_IsClosing())
if (!_IsClosing() && !_detached)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does it make sense to instead check for !_interactivity since it's used below?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When termcontrol isn't detached or closing we expect _interactivity to be non-null, no?

Given #10971 has happened in the past, I think THROW_HR_IF_NULL(E_UNEXPECTED, _interactivity) is better suited.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm OK with this for now

{
// create a custom automation peer with this code pattern:
// (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/accessibility/custom-automation-peers)
Expand Down
Loading