Improved type inference for lambdas in the case where a parameter inc…

…ludes a default value and the expected type doesn't include that parameter. This improvement was suggested in the [mypy issue tracker](python/mypy#15459).

packages/pyright-internal/src/analyzer/typeEvaluator.ts

@@ -13231,17 +13231,26 @@ export function createTypeEvaluator(importLookup: ImportLookup, evaluatorOptions
         // For now, use only the first expected type.
         const expectedFunctionType = expectedFunctionTypes.length > 0 ? expectedFunctionTypes[0] : undefined;
         let paramsArePositionOnly = true;
+        const expectedParamDetails = expectedFunctionType ? getParameterListDetails(expectedFunctionType) : undefined;
 
         node.parameters.forEach((param, index) => {
-            let paramType: Type = UnknownType.create();
-            if (expectedFunctionType && index < expectedFunctionType.details.parameters.length) {
-                paramType = FunctionType.getEffectiveParameterType(expectedFunctionType, index);
+            let paramType: Type | undefined;
+            if (expectedParamDetails) {
+                if (index < expectedParamDetails.params.length) {
+                    paramType = expectedParamDetails.params[index].type;
+                } else if (param.defaultValue) {
+                    // If the lambda param has a default value but there is no associated
+                    // parameter in the expected type, assume that the default value is
+                    // being used to explicitly capture a value from an outer scope. Infer
+                    // its type from the default value expression.
+                    paramType = getTypeOfExpression(param.defaultValue, undefined, inferenceContext).type;
+                }
             }
 
             if (param.name) {
                 writeTypeCache(
                     param.name,
-                    { type: transformVariadicParamType(node, param.category, paramType) },
+                    { type: transformVariadicParamType(node, param.category, paramType ?? UnknownType.create()) },
                     EvaluatorFlags.None
                 );
             }
@@ -13288,7 +13297,7 @@ export function createTypeEvaluator(importLookup: ImportLookup, evaluatorOptions
                 hasDefault: !!param.defaultValue,
                 defaultValueExpression: param.defaultValue,
                 hasDeclaredType: true,
-                type: paramType,
+                type: paramType ?? UnknownType.create(),
             };
 
             FunctionType.addParameter(functionType, functionParam);

packages/pyright-internal/src/tests/samples/lambda12.py

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+# This sample tests the case where a lambda includes one or more parameters
+# that accept a default value and the the expected type does not include
+# these parameters. In this case, the types of the extra parameters should
+# be inferred based on the default value type.
+
+# pyright: strict
+
+from typing import Callable
+
+
+def func1() -> list[Callable[[int], int]]:
+    return [lambda x, i=i: i * x for i in range(5)]

packages/pyright-internal/src/tests/typeEvaluator1.test.ts

@@ -681,6 +681,12 @@ test('Lambda11', () => {
     TestUtils.validateResults(analysisResults, 0);
 });
 
+test('Lambda12', () => {
+    const analysisResults = TestUtils.typeAnalyzeSampleFiles(['lambda12.py']);
+
+    TestUtils.validateResults(analysisResults, 0);
+});
+
 test('Call1', () => {
     const analysisResults = TestUtils.typeAnalyzeSampleFiles(['call1.py']);