RPM/Yum/Zypper/Centos/Fedora/Suse packages

[stuartpa]

This PR builds and signs the sqlcmd .rpm package for Yum (Centos/Fedora) and Zypper (OpenSuse) and tests the package for the following base images: centos:centos7 centos:centos8 fedora:29 fedora:30 fedora:31 opensuse/leap.

The PR is designed to work both directly in the local repo and Azure Dev Ops.

This PR is part of a series of 5 initial PRs that will provide packages for all the common managers on the common OSes (Linux, Windows and Mac). Follow up PRs will provide packages for less common configs.

Execute the following command from the root directory of this repository:

./release/linux/rpm/pipeline.sh

Output will be sent to ./output/rpm

To test the packages:

./release/linux/rpm/pipeline-test.sh

A follow up PR will publish the .rpms to packages.microsoft.com for public download

[shueybubbles]

Thanx for putting this together!
Let's convert package.yml into a template that we include in the build-product.yml as a step or separate job. We should be able to use the same bits in the Github release as the rpm.

[stuartpa]

Thanx for putting this together! Let's convert package.yml into a template that we include in the build-product.yml as a step or separate job. We should be able to use the same bits in the Github release as the rpm.

I've created package-product|common-create|common-test.yml. I'll do something similar for the publish part (presuming it's possible), then I'll create a pipeline to chain the 3 together. This keeps each .yml file doing one thing only.

[shueybubbles]

can this be a friendly name instead of a guid?

[shueybubbles]

or is it better to obfuscate our ADO names in the public repos?

[stuartpa]

The help says either:

Project | (Required) The project name or GUID from which to download the pipeline artifacts.

I am open either way. I think this can be the project name. Let me think on this.

[shueybubbles]

I think this entire stack is Linux-specific. Won't we need powershell or cmd scripts for Windows, and use a different signing profile?
Perhaps the template names should be based on the OS.

[stuartpa]

I think docker and mac can follow this format, I think windows is the only odd one out. I was planning to deal with that when I get to the Windows PR, and make the fewest possible changes when I get to the Windows PR (it might just come down to pipeline.sh vs pipeline.cmd etc.!

[shueybubbles]

can we add a trigger based on the product build pipeline per https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/devops/pipelines/process/resources?view=azure-devops&tabs=schema#define-a-pipelines-resource ?