chore: aspnet integration docs razor fixes

[iantonge]

Description

fix razor syntax in aspnet integration documentation

Motivation & context

There are a couple of minor mistakes in the razor syntax on the aspnet integrations documentation:

Copying the CDN link from the aspnet integration docs into a razor template causes a compilation error as the @ symbol needs to be escaped in razor.

Copying the fast-card sample code from the documentation renders a card where the title is the literal text 'ViewData["Title"]' rather than the value which should be 'Home Page'.

Issue type checklist

• Chore: A change that does not impact distributed packages.
• Bug fix: A change that fixes an issue, link to the issue above.
• New feature: A change that adds functionality.

Is this a breaking change?

• This change causes current functionality to break.

Adding or modifying component(s) in @microsoft/fast-components checklist

• I have added a new component
• I have modified an existing component
• I have updated the definition file
• I have updated the configuration file

Process & policy checklist

• I have added tests for my changes.
• I have tested my changes.
• I have updated the project documentation to reflect my changes.
• I have read the CONTRIBUTING documentation and followed the standards for this project.

[iantonge]

I'm not entirely clear on the etiquette of creating a pull request, or if I should create an issue first. For a couple of small changes to the docs an issue might not be necessary, but I'm happy to take direction on that.

As an aside, the link to https://www.fast.design/docs/en/contributing/standards appears to just show me that same content as https://www.fast.design right now.

[EisenbergEffect]

@iantonge This is perfect. Thank you! No need to create an issue for a doc fix like this. We'll get this reviewed and merged soon.

The contributor guide is here: https://www.fast.design/docs/community/contributor-guide Where did you find that old link? I'd like to get that fixed if you recall where you found it.

[iantonge]

@EisenbergEffect the old link is in the "Process & policy checklist" section of the PR template.