Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding section motivations #106

Merged

Conversation

yevster
Copy link
Contributor

@yevster yevster commented Feb 1, 2021

Fixes #104

Build a reactive Spring Boot microservice that uses the [Spring reactive stack](https://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/current/spring-framework-reference/web-reactive.html) and is bound to a [Cosmos DB database](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/?WT.mc_id=azurespringcloud-github-judubois) in order to access a globally-distributed database with optimum performance.
In this section, we'll build an application that uses a [Cosmos DB database](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/?WT.mc_id=azurespringcloud-github-judubois) in order to access a globally-distributed database with optimum performance.

We'll use the reactive programming paradigm to build our microservice in this section, leveraging the [Spring reactive stack](https://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/current/spring-framework-reference/web-reactive.html). In contrast, we'll build a more traditional data-driven microservice in the next section.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

And we'll ....

And I would remove the "In contrast" sentence here and mention something in the section where it is actually build

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Chewed on this... have to disagree. Saying "in contrast" creates a relationship between the two things. I think it makes it clearer that what we're showing is a "novel" paradigm, as opposed to a traditional one coming up.

@yevster yevster requested a review from selvasingh February 2, 2021 01:52
@selvasingh selvasingh merged commit 0f1b5f6 into microsoft:master Feb 5, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Each step should carry an intro text
3 participants