Skip to content

Report circular JSDoc type references #27404

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 5, 2018

Conversation

sandersn
Copy link
Member

JSDoc types references can often be to values, which can often be circular in ways that types tied to declarations cannot. I decided to create a separate property on SymbolLinks rather than reusing declaredType, although I'm not sure that's strictly required.

Fixes #27346

JSDoc types references can often be to values, which can often be
circular in ways that types tied to declarations cannot. I decided to
create a separate property on SymbolLinks rather than reusing
declaredType, although I'm not sure that's strictly required.
@sandersn sandersn added this to the TypeScript 3.1 milestone Sep 27, 2018
Copy link
Member

@DanielRosenwasser DanielRosenwasser left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oh boy

@sandersn sandersn merged commit 36e212b into release-3.1 Oct 5, 2018
@sandersn sandersn deleted the js/report-circular-jsdoc-type-references branch October 5, 2018 22:41
@sandersn
Copy link
Member Author

sandersn commented Oct 5, 2018

This is now in master as well.

sandersn added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2018
JSDoc types references can often be to values, which can often be
circular in ways that types tied to declarations cannot. I decided to
create a separate property on SymbolLinks rather than reusing
declaredType, although I'm not sure that's strictly required.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants