- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 13.1k
Add support for JSX fragment syntax #19249
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Merged
      
      
    
  
     Merged
                    Changes from all commits
      Commits
    
    
            Show all changes
          
          
            11 commits
          
        
        Select commit
          Hold shift + click to select a range
      
      abb3f58
              
                Add support for JSX fragment syntax
              
              
                uniqueiniquity 269d37a
              
                Update tests
              
              
                uniqueiniquity 5f8a1b5
              
                Add baselines
              
              
                uniqueiniquity 845f573
              
                Update API baselines
              
              
                uniqueiniquity 7566529
              
                Respond to CR
              
              
                uniqueiniquity a7f9ec0
              
                Respond to CR
              
              
                uniqueiniquity fb05886
              
                Respond to CR
              
              
                uniqueiniquity 961495b
              
                Remove unnecessary type annotation
              
              
                uniqueiniquity 5dd1a47
              
                Error when using fragment with jsxFactory
              
              
                uniqueiniquity a83ec41
              
                Added test for preventing fragment with jsxFactory
              
              
                uniqueiniquity 3ebb2e8
              
                Merge branch 'master' into jsxFragment
              
              
                uniqueiniquity File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
          Failed to load comments.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Jump to
        
          Jump to file
        
      
      
          Failed to load files.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
      
      Oops, something went wrong.
        
    
  
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this perhaps be customizable, similar to how
--jsxFactoryis? e.g.--jsxFragmentComponent?Arguably not useful for anything but React and React clones, though; as other less similar frameworks would want to do other special processing on fragments.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with your second point here; to take the example of Mithril, the framework supports fragments, but with a completely different approach than React will (i.e.
m.fragment(attrs, children)) so it's not as convenient as simply replacing the call tocreateElementwith--jsxFactory. It seems to make sense in this case to just preserve the JSX syntax as is for non-React libs and have each define their own transpilation depending on their implementation of fragments.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Kovensky do you know what babel will do here? would it support another version of the paragma for the
React.createElement?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
checked with @hzoo over slack and does not seem that babel have plans for this in the immediate term.
I wounder if we should just make it an error to use Fragment +
--jsx React+--jsxNamespaceThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@uniqueiniquity can you file an issue for adding the error.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, I think I see now. I'm confusing
jsxFactoryandreactNamespaceThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So are you on board with issuing the error?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably, but feel free not to block this PR on it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated the PR to issue an error.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In the Babel PR, I add a pragma for fragments, as @mhegazy suggested. https://github.com/babel/babel/pull/6552/files#diff-7e5b807d66ce513f501563ad8f8d03e6R117
https://github.com/babel/babel/pull/6552/files#diff-7e5b807d66ce513f501563ad8f8d03e6R89