Description
π Search Terms
"import assertions", "import attributes", "assert"
β Viability Checklist
- This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
- This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, new syntax sugar for JS, etc.)
- This isn't a request to add a new utility type: https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/No-New-Utility-Types
- This feature would agree with the rest of our Design Goals: https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/TypeScript-Design-Goals
β Suggestion
Currently Stage 3 Import Attributes deprecates the assert
keywords and is working to remove them from the spec if possible. V8 will remove support for the assert
keywords, so Node.js and Chrome will follow suit.
Hey, quick update on this. Node.js is planning to remove support for
assert
in v22 (which will be released in April) and Chrome in v126 (which will be released in May).
I would like to remove support for the assert
keywords from TypeScript as well, and would like to add disallowAssertKeywords
to the compiler options as a beginning.
FYI
JSR bans publishing of TypeScript/JavaScript files that use the assert
keywords.
jsr-io/jsr#427
I've made a PR for swc, but it is pending because I can't include features that are not in tsc.
swc-project/swc#8913
π Motivating Example
The following code will fail if the disallowAssertKeywords
option is enabled.
import foo from "./foo.json" assert { type: "json" };
π» Use Cases
- What do you want to use this for?
Deno / JSR
- What shortcomings exist with current approaches?
Deprecated the assert
keywords cannot be rejected
- What workarounds are you using in the meantime?
N/A