-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 536
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add GitHub issue template for deprecated APIs #9006
Merged
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ | ||
--- | ||
name: Deprecated API | ||
about: Track the cleanup of a deprecated API | ||
title: '' | ||
labels: 'api deprecation' | ||
assignees: '' | ||
|
||
--- | ||
|
||
## Deprecated API | ||
<!-- Describe the API along with its associated classes, interfaces, packages, etc. --> | ||
|
||
**Context** | ||
<!-- An explanation of why this API should be deprecated and ultimately removed --> | ||
|
||
**Approach** | ||
<!-- An explanation of the intended replacement/solution --> | ||
|
||
**Dependencies** | ||
scottn12 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
<!-- Indicate if there are any dependencies that must be handled first --> | ||
|
||
**Phases** | ||
<!-- Layout a clear plan listing each step necessary to complete the cleanup --> | ||
|
||
**Expected Timeline** | ||
<!-- When you expect this API will be fully removed. If possible give a release version --> | ||
|
||
**Open Questions** | ||
<!-- List any unknowns that need to be addressed before removing the API --> | ||
|
||
|
||
<!-- By filing an Issue, you are expected to comply with the Code of Conduct: https://github.com/microsoft/FluidFramework/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md --> | ||
|
||
<!-- Lastly, be sure to preview your issue before saving. Thanks! --> |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it possible to have it automatically assign the issue to the author? If so, we may want to consider that
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably, right? If you're trying to encourage accountability of cleaning up deprecations. Otherwise in this sort of case it's kind of like throwing it into the void
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I think that would be ideal, however I haven't been able to find anything documented on how to do that with templates. If it's not possible, I can just add a line to the template mentioning that it should be assigned to someone, and if you don't know who then assign yourself.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Over the weekend I learned about a beta GitHub feature that might be a good fit here: https://docs.github.com/en/communities/using-templates-to-encourage-useful-issues-and-pull-requests/configuring-issue-templates-for-your-repository#creating-issue-forms.
I don't know if you can self-assign, though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I tested it out a little bit and it looks like you can't auto assign via issue templates and most likely not with issue forms either. However, I did find this GitHub Action that could work here. @tylerbutler what do you think?