Skip to content

Conversation

@littleaj
Copy link
Contributor

Not much else to say here. The files aren't used yet so this won't have an impact on the current functionality.

Do review the changes to the shadowing configuration with more rigor. I changed the paths to some of our dependencies. This shouldn't affect anything unless someone is using the dependency out of our package (which shouldn't be happening).

@littleaj littleaj self-assigned this Aug 10, 2018
@littleaj littleaj requested review from dhaval24 and grlima August 10, 2018 22:43
@littleaj littleaj requested a review from tokaplan August 10, 2018 22:53
Copy link
Contributor

@dhaval24 dhaval24 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In general this looks good to me. I believe most of proto files are autogenerated via the plugin which is definitely awesome! I just gave a heads up on one of the comments. If that is fine, I am fine with this changes going through! Ensure, that all smoke tests pass and I would also like to try on SpringBoot app too to see if all is good there.

@littleaj littleaj mentioned this pull request Aug 29, 2018
3 tasks
@littleaj littleaj requested a review from dhaval24 September 5, 2018 20:57
int32 ver = 1;

// only one metric in the list is currently supported by Application Insights storage. If multiple data points were sent only the first one will be used.
repeated DataPoint metrics = 2;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I still believe that this List should be depreciated from the MetricData class which is creating this non-sense. Indeed we can bring in all the fields in the MetricData class inside the DataPoint class and just deprecate the whole class itself. It is of no use IMO and is just taking Memory footprint. Anyways, can be a conversation for seperate PR.

Copy link
Contributor

@dhaval24 dhaval24 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this PR is ready to go. @littleaj just clean up commented code in the build files.

@littleaj littleaj merged commit fbf1375 into master Sep 10, 2018
@littleaj littleaj deleted the localServer/protobuf branch September 10, 2018 18:35
littleaj added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants