We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
There is a bug in rule "templates-use-public": If only modifier "readonly" is present, a member is public, but the rule considers it private.
Tested with 2.0.0-beta.3.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for reporting the issue! I will introduce a fix in the next release.
Sorry, something went wrong.
fix: proper check for public members
3e6a125
Fix #206
cc3ed9a
No branches or pull requests
There is a bug in rule "templates-use-public": If only modifier "readonly" is present, a member is public, but the rule considers it private.
Tested with 2.0.0-beta.3.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: