This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 9, 2024. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
Delombok code before building javadocs #300
Labels
enhancement
New feature or request
good first issue
Good for newcomers
help wanted
Extra attention is needed
Comments
queer
added
enhancement
New feature or request
help wanted
Extra attention is needed
good first issue
Good for newcomers
labels
Apr 3, 2019
Stop stealing all the good numbers :( |
git gud |
HA i get it |
queer
changed the title
Mark lombok stuff with @exclude javadocs
Delombok code before building javadocs
Apr 8, 2019
More accurate title 😅 Really the problem is just that some lombok members don't exist per se, so it makes sense that javadoc wouldn't be aware of them. Delomboking before generating docs should solve this. It might be acceptable to just do something like (Source) <plugin>
<groupId>org.projectlombok</groupId>
<artifactId>lombok-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.18.0.0</version>
<configuration>
<sourceDirectory>${project.basedir}/src/main/java</sourceDirectory>
<outputDirectory>${delombok.output}</outputDirectory>
<addOutputDirectory>false</addOutputDirectory>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<phase>generate-sources</phase>
<goals>
<goal>delombok</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-javadoc-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.9</version>
<configuration>
<sourcepath>${delombok.output}</sourcepath>
</configuration>
</plugin> |
mirabilos
added a commit
to qvest-digital/rfc822
that referenced
this issue
Jan 13, 2021
delombok output is NOT used for compilation but as javadoc input; fixes: projectlombok/lombok#2502 from mewna/catnip#300 😼
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
enhancement
New feature or request
good first issue
Good for newcomers
help wanted
Extra attention is needed
In THEORY this should deal with the kinds of build failures we see in ex #277.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: