Skip to content

Issues: metebalci/digsec

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

11 Open 23 Closed
11 Open 23 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

support IDNA (RFC 3490) enhancement New feature or request
#38 opened Jul 31, 2023 by metebalci
@metebalci
support NSEC3 negative validation
#36 opened Nov 21, 2022 by metebalci
1
support CNAME, NSEC3PARAM, PTR, SRV record types
#35 opened Nov 21, 2022 by metebalci
implement unknown record type
#33 opened Nov 21, 2022 by metebalci
introduce digsec-test.org enhancement New feature or request
#27 opened Nov 14, 2022 by metebalci
@metebalci
warning when ZSK is not in DS question Further information is requested
#26 opened Nov 14, 2022 by metebalci
@metebalci
confirm single key use cases question Further information is requested
#25 opened Nov 14, 2022 by metebalci
@metebalci
create a full testsuite enhancement New feature or request
#22 opened Nov 13, 2022 by metebalci
@metebalci
canonical_rrset in validate.py sometimes contain None
#20 opened Nov 12, 2022 by emdee-is
1
Validate non existent records/nsec enhancement New feature or request
#16 opened Nov 11, 2022 by metebalci
@metebalci
improve validate.py for 2+ level domains bug Something isn't working
#14 opened Nov 11, 2022 by metebalci
@metebalci
ProTip! Follow long discussions with comments:>50.