Skip to content

Conversation

predic8
Copy link
Member

@predic8 predic8 commented Jul 30, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated and reorganized the roadmap to reflect revised version milestones and upcoming features.
    • Clarified and condensed planned changes, deprecated items, and internal notes.
    • Improved formatting and removed outdated or duplicate content for better readability.

@predic8 predic8 requested a review from rrayst July 30, 2025 13:57
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 30, 2025

Walkthrough

The roadmap documentation was thoroughly updated to reflect revised and reorganized plans for future versions. Version milestones were advanced and clarified, with new features, internal refactorings, and deprecated items consolidated or reformulated. Formatting, duplicate entries, and outdated notes were cleaned up, but no code or APIs were changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Roadmap Documentation
docs/ROADMAP.md
Updated and reorganized roadmap entries, advanced version numbers, clarified feature plans, cleaned up notes, and adjusted formatting. No code or API changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~7 minutes

Poem

A roadmap fresh, with plans anew,
Milestones shifted, ambitions grew.
Old notes swept, the clutter gone,
Now clear the path we hop along.
With whiskers twitching, eyes alight—
Onward to version seven’s height!
🐇✨

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch new-roadmap

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@predic8 predic8 requested review from t-burch and removed request for rrayst July 30, 2025 13:57
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
docs/ROADMAP.md (4)

3-8: Use fenced code blocks for method-signature diffs

Showing a Java signature diff inside normal Markdown text is hard to read. Wrap the original and new signatures in a fenced java code block or inline back-ticks so that they’re rendered monospace and are easily copy-pasted.

- Change Signature: public Exchange call(Exchange exc) throws Exception
-    =>  public void call(Exchange exc) throws Exception {
+```java
+// before
+public Exchange call(Exchange exc) throws Exception;
+
+// after
+public void call(Exchange exc) throws Exception;
+```

12-12: Spelling typo in JSONPath example

<mask>$.cusomter.payment.creditcardcustomer

- <mask>$.cusomter.payment.creditcard
+<mask>$.customer.payment.creditcard

48-48: Fix heading level jump (MD001)

The previous heading is # 6.3.0 (H1). Jumping straight to ### Internal (H3) violates the “increment by one” rule. Change to ## Internal.

-### Internal
+## Internal

50-50: Avoid bare URL (MD034)

Convert the raw URL into an inline link to keep the document lint-clean and user-friendly.

-  - new Namespace e.g. https://membrane-api.io...6
+  - new Namespace (e.g. <https://membrane-api.io…6>)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5135939 and d113160.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/ROADMAP.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
docs/ROADMAP.md

48-48: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
Expected: h2; Actual: h3

(MD001, heading-increment)


50-50: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: Automated tests
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (java)

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
docs/ROADMAP.md (4)

3-9: Normalize heading hierarchy to avoid MD001 violations
The document already has a top-level title on Line 1. The version titles that follow should therefore be second-level (##) headings, not first-level (#), to keep the hierarchy consistent and silence markdown-lint.

-# 7.0.0
+# ## 7.0.0-# 6.5.0
+# ## 6.5.0

5-7: Render method signatures as fenced code for readability
Without back-ticks the < and > can be interpreted as HTML and the long line wraps badly.

-  - Change Signature: public Exchange call(Exchange exc) throws Exception
-    =>  public void call(Exchange exc) throws Exception {
+  - Change Signature:
+    ```java
+    // before
+    public Exchange call(Exchange exc) throws Exception;
+
+    // after
+    public void call(Exchange exc) throws Exception;
+    ```

14-16: Escape XML-like tags to prevent them being treated as HTML
The raw <apiKey/> and <scriptXX> will be swallowed by many Markdown renderers. Fence them or escape the angle brackets.

-- <apiKey/>
-    <scriptXX>${json[key]}</scriptXX>
+- ```xml
+  <apiKey/>
+  <scriptXX>${json[key]}</scriptXX>
+  ```

21-23: Tighten wording for the Cookie refactor task
Grammatically unclear: “Cookie maybe centralize Cookie Handling in a Cookie class”. Streamline for immediate comprehension.

-- Refactor: Cookie maybe centralize Cookie Handling in a Cookie class
+- Refactor Cookie handling: centralize logic in a dedicated `Cookie` helper class
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d113160 and a90d4b8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/ROADMAP.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
docs/ROADMAP.md

56-56: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
Expected: h2; Actual: h3

(MD001, heading-increment)


58-58: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (java)

@t-burch t-burch merged commit 2ca564a into master Jul 30, 2025
5 checks passed
@t-burch t-burch deleted the new-roadmap branch July 30, 2025 14:31
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Aug 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants