feat(ci): GitHub test workflow annotations for `UserWarning`s (and possibly other cases)

[ReubenFrankel]

Feature scope

Taps (catalog, state, tests, etc.)

Description

How do you feel about using workflow commands to create annotations for things like the UserWarning messages that are output? This could be useful in to highlight issues at a glance, rather than having to trawl through the Pytest output log.

Here's a POC I put together for tap-spotify:

    - name: Test with pytest
      run: |
        __generate_annotations () {
          level=$1
          pattern=$2
          title=${3:-'\1'}
          message=${4:-'\0'}

          test -z "$level" \
            && echo 'Error: level is required' \
            && exit 1

          test "$level" != debug \
            && test "$level" != notice \
            && test "$level" != warning \
            && test "$level" != error \
            && echo 'Error: level must be one of [ debug | notice | warning | error ]' \
            && exit 1

          test -z "$pattern" \
            && echo 'Error: pattern is required' \
            && exit 1

          sed -E "s/.*($pattern)/::$level title=${{ github.job }} (${{ matrix.python-version }}): $title::$message/"
        }

        debug () { __generate_annotations $FUNCNAME "$@"; }
        notice () { __generate_annotations $FUNCNAME "$@"; }
        warning () { __generate_annotations $FUNCNAME "$@"; }
        error () { __generate_annotations $FUNCNAME "$@"; }

        poetry run pytest | warning UserWarning

https://github.com/Matatika/tap-spotify/actions/runs/11362287222

[edgarrmondragon]

Something like that would indeed be nice.

I'll try to revive pytest-dev/pytest-github-actions-annotate-failures#68.

[edgarrmondragon]

Something like that would indeed be nice.

I'll try to revive pytest-dev/pytest-github-actions-annotate-failures#68.