Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix the summary of the documents.embeds article #4640

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 1, 2021
Merged

Fix the summary of the documents.embeds article #4640

merged 1 commit into from
May 1, 2021

Conversation

sideshowbarker
Copy link
Member

Fixes #4576

@sideshowbarker sideshowbarker requested a review from a team as a code owner May 1, 2021 08:28
@sideshowbarker sideshowbarker requested review from jpmedley and removed request for a team May 1, 2021 08:28
@sideshowbarker sideshowbarker mentioned this pull request May 1, 2021
Closed
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 1, 2021

Preview URLs

Flaws

None! 🎉

External URLs

URL: /en-US/docs/Web/API/Document/embeds
Title: Document.embeds
on GitHub

wbamberg
wbamberg approved these changes May 1, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@wbamberg wbamberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 thanks @sideshowbarker !

@wbamberg wbamberg merged commit 886e655 into main May 1, 2021
@wbamberg wbamberg deleted the sideshowbarker/document.embeds-correction branch May 1, 2021 22:13
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 14, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Reviewers

@wbamberg wbamberg wbamberg approved these changes

@jpmedley jpmedley Awaiting requested review from jpmedley

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Possible mistake in documentation
2 participants
@sideshowbarker @wbamberg