Fix Return Value for Writable Stream #42174
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Update return value description to specify 'undefined' per mdn#42173
anonhostpi
requested review from
sideshowbarker
and removed request for
a team
github-actions
bot
added
Content:WebAPI
anonhostpi
commented
Nov 30, 2025
| ### Return value | ||
|
|
||
| A {{jsxref("Promise")}}, which fulfills with the value given in the `reason` parameter. | ||
| A {{jsxref("Promise")}}, which fulfills with `undefined` value. |
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
wbamberg
reviewed
Dec 1, 2025
Contributor
|
Preview URLs |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Update return value description to specify 'undefined' per #42173
Description
Current return type of
reasonis incorrect as indicated by testing in #42173. Updated toundefinedMotivation
Noticed the docs were wrong while trying to implement WritableStream.abort in my own code.
Additional details/related issues and pull requests
Fixes #42173