Repository navigation
Conversation
Contributor
|
Tip: Review these changes grouped by change (recommended for most PRs), or grouped by feature (for large PRs). |
8 tasks done
Merged
hamishwillee
deleted the
ff155_webtransport_protocols_constructor_option
branch
August 30, 2026 23:26
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
FF155 adds support for a
WebTransportapp to specify a list of preferred application-specific protocols in the constructor, and for the server to return its preferred option inWebTransport.protocol.The
WebTransport.protocolentry is present, but the correspondingoptions_protocols_parameterwas omitted. This just mirrorsWebTransport.protocolsupport, since they go together.PS All these options omit docs links. I didn't add them myself.
Related docs work can be tracked in mdn/content#45302