Skip to content

chore(deps): upgrade prose-reader to 1.360.0 - #606

Merged
mbret merged 1 commit into
developfrom
claude/upgrade-prose-reader-1.360
Aug 26, 2026
Merged

chore(deps): upgrade prose-reader to 1.360.0#606
mbret merged 1 commit into
developfrom
claude/upgrade-prose-reader-1.360

Conversation

@mbret

@mbret mbret commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

What

Uniform bump of every @prose-reader/* pin from ^1.359.0 to ^1.360.0.

The release carries prose-reader#329, which exposes archive-reader's OPF identifier scheme vocabulary:

  • OPF_IDENTIFIER_SCHEME_ATTRIBUTES / opfIdentifierSchemeAttribute — the accepted scheme attribute spellings (opf:scheme, opf:Scheme, scheme) and which one an element carries
  • opfIdentifierTypeScheme — the scheme an EPUB 3 identifier-type refinement names, translating onix:codelist5 codes

This repo's OPF writer currently restates both, including a byte-for-byte copy of the ONIX table. #586 consumes the exports and deletes that copy; this PR only moves the dependency, so nothing behaves differently yet.

Testing

  • packages/archive-metadata: 101 tests pass
  • apps/web: 300 tests pass
  • tsc clean on archive-metadata, apps/web, apps/api; biome clean
  • installed versions verified at 1.360.0 across all twelve pinned packages, enhancer-pdf included

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Brings archive-reader's OPF identifier scheme vocabulary — the accepted
scheme attribute spellings and the ONIX codelist 5 crosswalk — which
this repo's OPF writer currently restates.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
oboku Ready Ready Preview Aug 26, 2026 10:39pm
oboku-landing Ready Ready Preview Aug 26, 2026 10:39pm

@mbret
mbret merged commit 7c094c1 into develop Aug 26, 2026
5 checks passed
@mbret
mbret deleted the claude/upgrade-prose-reader-1.360 branch August 26, 2026 22:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant