Skip to content

Runewidth speedup #47

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

markus-oberhumer
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

This makes sure that future optimizations don't break functionality.
This results in a 6x speedup for the common case RuneWidth768.

name                        old time/op  new time/op  delta
RuneWidth768-4              21.5µs ± 0%   2.7µs ± 0%  -87.27%  (p=0.029 n=4+4)
RuneWidthAll-4              51.1ms ± 0%  45.3ms ± 0%  -11.38%  (p=0.029 n=4+4)
String1Width768-4            219µs ± 2%   198µs ± 2%   -9.73%  (p=0.029 n=4+4)
RuneWidth768EastAsian-4     35.6µs ± 0%  34.2µs ± 0%   -3.86%  (p=0.029 n=4+4)
RuneWidthAllEastAsian-4     71.5ms ± 0%  69.1ms ± 0%   -3.26%  (p=0.029 n=4+4)
String1WidthAll-4            356ms ± 1%   353ms ± 2%     ~     (p=0.343 n=4+4)
String1WidthAllEastAsian-4   378ms ± 1%   378ms ± 2%     ~     (p=0.886 n=4+4)
String1Width768EastAsian-4   236µs ± 1%   235µs ± 2%     ~     (p=0.886 n=4+4)
[Geo mean]                  3.44ms       2.56ms       -25.63%
@markus-oberhumer
Copy link
Contributor Author

This results in a 6x speedup for the common case RuneWidth768.

name                        old time/op  new time/op  delta
RuneWidth768-4              21.5µs ± 0%   2.7µs ± 0%  -87.27%  (p=0.029 n=4+4)
RuneWidthAll-4              51.1ms ± 0%  45.3ms ± 0%  -11.38%  (p=0.029 n=4+4)
String1Width768-4            219µs ± 2%   198µs ± 2%   -9.73%  (p=0.029 n=4+4)
RuneWidth768EastAsian-4     35.6µs ± 0%  34.2µs ± 0%   -3.86%  (p=0.029 n=4+4)
RuneWidthAllEastAsian-4     71.5ms ± 0%  69.1ms ± 0%   -3.26%  (p=0.029 n=4+4)
String1WidthAll-4            356ms ± 1%   353ms ± 2%     ~     (p=0.343 n=4+4)
String1WidthAllEastAsian-4   378ms ± 1%   378ms ± 2%     ~     (p=0.886 n=4+4)
String1Width768EastAsian-4   236µs ± 1%   235µs ± 2%     ~     (p=0.886 n=4+4)
[Geo mean]                  3.44ms       2.56ms       -25.63%

@makew0rld
Copy link

How does this compare with #42?

@markus-oberhumer
Copy link
Contributor Author

How does this compare with #42?

Should be about the same. Once this request is merged more micro-optimizations can easily be made because of the new benchmarks.

@mattn
Copy link
Owner

mattn commented Mar 31, 2021

Could you please resolve conflicts?

@markus-oberhumer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Will do, but please fix the master branch first - commit c9bd7d1 seems broken.

@mattn
Copy link
Owner

mattn commented Mar 31, 2021

I merged this.

43a826d

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants