Loosen types for get #20
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Co-authored-by: Marcus <ukendio@gmail.com>
LastTalon
approved these changes
Apr 18, 2024
Co-authored-by: metrowaii <metrowairblx@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: ATK <54485972+ATK422@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
the overload for :get will always return nullable components and it needs to be passed a nominal entity type; but it wont matter whether components mismatch so dev experience should be better w/ it in most cases.
It is also pretty reflective of how ECS as a data structure works. random access are always not guaranteed to retrieve a specific component