Split out federation transaction sending to a worker #1635
Conversation
erikjohnston
changed the title
erikjohnston
force-pushed
the
erikj/split_out_fed_txn
branch
from
e2e94e3
to
88d85eb
Compare
|
|
||
| # There should be only one reader, so lets delete everything its | ||
| # acknowledged its seen. | ||
| self._clear_queue_before_pos(token) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Might be worth trying to use a separate parameter for controlling the acks. For example there's a script in scripts-dev that tails all replication rows, if you ran it againtst synapse it might inadvertently delete all the federation queues. That could be awkward.
If you used a separate parameter for acknowledging like ack_federation or something and didn't report it in the list of streams then I don't think this would be such a problem.
Although it might be that case that we are better off not exposing the federation in the list of streams.
| else: | ||
| self.edus[pos] = edu | ||
|
|
||
| def send_presence(self, destination, states): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I wonder if we send lots of identical messages to multiple dests. I wonder if it might be possible to reduce the duplication here if that is the case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Probably, but I think that can be dealt with later if necessary.
|
@NegativeMjark PTAL |
Or events that are sent via the federation "send_join" API. This should match the behaviour from before v0.18.5 and #1635 landed.
No description provided.