This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 26, 2024. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix bug in device list caching when remote users leave rooms #13749
Fix bug in device list caching when remote users leave rooms #13749
Changes from 5 commits
18e5f60
766b136
17dd441
10595c8
5a12cb7
d928704
b234f4d
f104cc1
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not fully convinced this check is useful, because it'll only catch
/keys/query
requests done while we no longer share a room with a remote user, which I wouldn't expect to happen often, or at all.It's also slightly racy and can trigger spuriously when a remote user leaves a room while we're in the middle of handling the request.
Do we want to keep it or remove it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think its valid for clients to do a
/keys/query
for users they don't share a room with, e.g. because they're about to start a DM or something?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That sounds plausible!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Needs #13746, otherwise we can raise errors when there are malformed user IDs in the room state.