Skip to content

Conversation

reivilibre
Copy link
Contributor

@reivilibre reivilibre commented Jul 3, 2020

Rendered

Signed-off-by: Olivier Wilkinson (reivilibre) olivier@librepush.net

Signed-off-by: Olivier Wilkinson (reivilibre) <olivier@librepush.net>
@reivilibre reivilibre changed the title MSC2663 placeholder MSC2663: Errors for dealing with inexistent push rules Jul 6, 2020
@reivilibre reivilibre marked this pull request as ready for review July 6, 2020 12:14
@turt2live turt2live added kind:maintenance MSC which clarifies/updates existing spec proposal A matrix spec change proposal proposal-in-review labels Jul 6, 2020
@richvdh
Copy link
Member

richvdh commented Jul 9, 2020

inexistent isn't a word. You might say... it's inexistent.

Copy link
Member

@richvdh richvdh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@turt2live turt2live self-requested a review July 9, 2020 17:36
@reivilibre
Copy link
Contributor Author

It's not clear to me that 'inexistent' isn't a word; it features on https://www.wordnik.com/words/inexistent .

However, it's not in the Cambridge dictionary so I suppose I will switch over :).

Signed-off-by: Olivier Wilkinson (reivilibre) <olivier@librepush.net>
@richvdh richvdh changed the title MSC2663: Errors for dealing with inexistent push rules MSC2663: Errors for dealing with non-existent push rules Jul 17, 2020
@richvdh
Copy link
Member

richvdh commented Jul 17, 2020

synapse implementation is matrix-org/synapse#7796

@richvdh
Copy link
Member

richvdh commented Jul 17, 2020

I'm going to propose FCP on this even though the impl hasn't landed yet, because it's pretty trivial

@richvdh
Copy link
Member

richvdh commented Jul 17, 2020

@mscbot fcp merge

@mscbot
Copy link
Collaborator

mscbot commented Jul 17, 2020

Team member @richvdh has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged people:

Once at least 75% of reviewers approve (and there are no outstanding concerns), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up!

See this document for information about what commands tagged team members can give me.

@mscbot mscbot added disposition-merge proposed-final-comment-period Currently awaiting signoff of a majority of team members in order to enter the final comment period. labels Jul 17, 2020
Comment on lines +38 to +40
{
"errcode": "M_NOT_FOUND"
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hopefully with a message too when it comes to speccing.

@mscbot
Copy link
Collaborator

mscbot commented Jul 24, 2020

🔔 This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. 🔔

@mscbot mscbot added final-comment-period This MSC has entered a final comment period in interest to approval, postpone, or delete in 5 days. and removed proposed-final-comment-period Currently awaiting signoff of a majority of team members in order to enter the final comment period. labels Jul 24, 2020
@mscbot
Copy link
Collaborator

mscbot commented Jul 29, 2020

The final comment period, with a disposition to merge, as per the review above, is now complete.

@mscbot mscbot added finished-final-comment-period and removed disposition-merge final-comment-period This MSC has entered a final comment period in interest to approval, postpone, or delete in 5 days. labels Jul 29, 2020
@turt2live turt2live merged commit 0973e88 into master Jul 29, 2020
@turt2live turt2live added spec-pr-missing Proposal has been implemented and is being used in the wild but hasn't yet been added to the spec and removed finished-final-comment-period labels Jul 29, 2020
turt2live added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2020
@turt2live turt2live added spec-pr-in-review A proposal which has been PR'd against the spec and is in review and removed spec-pr-missing Proposal has been implemented and is being used in the wild but hasn't yet been added to the spec labels Sep 30, 2020
@turt2live
Copy link
Member

Spec PR: #2796

@turt2live turt2live added merged A proposal whose PR has merged into the spec! and removed spec-pr-in-review A proposal which has been PR'd against the spec and is in review labels Oct 7, 2020
@turt2live
Copy link
Member

Merged 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind:maintenance MSC which clarifies/updates existing spec merged A proposal whose PR has merged into the spec! proposal A matrix spec change proposal
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants