[REFACTOR] Could `lua/mason/ui/instance.lua` be factored out?

[miEsMar]

I've searched open issues for similar requests

• Yes

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

By doing some tiny optimisation in lua/mason/ui/init.lua, I noticed it ended up being a simple wrapper around lua/mason/ui/instance.lua.

diff --git a/lua/mason/ui/init.lua b/lua/mason/ui/init.lua
index bbe534a..cf4f979 100644
--- a/lua/mason/ui/init.lua
+++ b/lua/mason/ui/init.lua
@@ -1,25 +1,23 @@
+local instance  = require "mason.ui.instance"
+
 local M = {}
 
-function M.close()
-    local api = require "mason.ui.instance"
-    api.close()
-end
+-- function M.close()
+--     instance.close()
+-- end
 
 function M.open()
-    local api = require "mason.ui.instance"
-    api.window.open()
+    instance.window.open()
 end
 
 ---@param view string
 function M.set_view(view)
-    local api = require "mason.ui.instance"
-    api.set_view(view)
+    instance.set_view(view)
 end
 
 ---@param tag any
 function M.set_sticky_cursor(tag)
-    local api = require "mason.ui.instance"
-    api.set_sticky_cursor(tag)
+    instance.set_sticky_cursor(tag)
 end
 
 return M

Describe the solution you'd like

So, why not inlining instance.lua in init.lua in the UI top-level component, and avoid one level of indirection?

Describe potential alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional context

No response