Skip to content

feat:Added the parameter parsing mode to parse any to the specified type #148

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 19, 2025

Conversation

hl540
Copy link
Contributor

@hl540 hl540 commented Apr 14, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced input processing to reliably handle a broader range of data types, contributing to improved system stability and accuracy.
  • Chores

    • Updated underlying dependencies to support refined data conversion and processing.
    • Introduced new testing functionality to ensure the accuracy of input parsing.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 14, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a new dependency and several new functions. A dependency on the github.com/spf13/cast v1.7.1 package has been added via the go.mod file. New utility functions in mcp/utils.go now handle parsing different data types from a CallToolRequest, including boolean, various integer sizes, floats, strings, and maps. Additionally, a new test function in mcp/tools_test.go verifies these parsing functions, with the necessary update to import the fmt package for logging.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
go.mod Added new dependency: github.com/spf13/cast v1.7.1.
mcp/tools_test.go Added new test function TestParseToolCallToolRequest to verify parsing functions, including an import of the fmt package for logging.
mcp/utils.go Added multiple parsing functions (ParseArgument, ParseBoolean, ParseInt64, ParseInt32, ParseInt16, ParseInt8, ParseInt, ParseUInt, etc.) to extract various types from a CallToolRequest.

Tip

⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments and issue comments, within and outside of PR's. This feature enhances review and issue discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments and add commits to existing pull requests.
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
mcp/tools_test.go (1)

249-263: Consider adding edge case tests.

While the current tests cover the basic functionality, consider adding tests for edge cases such as:

  • Missing keys (default value behavior)
  • Invalid format values (e.g., "not-a-number" for numeric types)
  • Values that would overflow smaller integer types

This would make the tests more robust and ensure the behavior is consistent across all edge cases.

 request.Params.Arguments = map[string]interface{}{
 	"bool_value":    "true",
 	"int64_value":   "123456789",
 	"int32_value":   "123456789",
 	"int16_value":   "123456789",
 	"int8_value":    "123456789",
 	"int_value":     "123456789",
 	"uint_value":    "123456789",
 	"uint64_value":  "123456789",
 	"uint32_value":  "123456789",
 	"uint16_value":  "123456789",
 	"uint8_value":   "123456789",
 	"float32_value": "3.14",
 	"float64_value": "3.1415926",
 	"string_value":  "hello",
+	// Add edge cases
+	"invalid_number": "not-a-number",
+	"overflow_int8":  "999",
 }
mcp/utils.go (1)

599-605: Consider simplifying the conditional logic.

The current implementation uses an if-else structure, but this could be simplified to make the code more concise.

 func ParseArgument(request CallToolRequest, key string, defaultVal any) any {
-	if _, ok := request.Params.Arguments[key]; !ok {
-		return defaultVal
-	} else {
-		return request.Params.Arguments[key]
-	}
+	if val, ok := request.Params.Arguments[key]; ok {
+		return val
+	}
+	return defaultVal
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c509bf9 and 29d8725.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • go.mod (1 hunks)
  • mcp/tools_test.go (2 hunks)
  • mcp/utils.go (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (2)
mcp/tools_test.go (3)
mcp/tools.go (1)
  • CallToolRequest (44-59)
mcp/types.go (1)
  • Params (104-104)
mcp/utils.go (14)
  • ParseBoolean (607-610)
  • ParseInt64 (612-615)
  • ParseInt32 (617-620)
  • ParseInt16 (622-625)
  • ParseInt8 (627-630)
  • ParseInt (632-635)
  • ParseUInt (637-640)
  • ParseUInt64 (642-645)
  • ParseUInt32 (647-650)
  • ParseUInt16 (652-655)
  • ParseUInt8 (657-660)
  • ParseFloat32 (662-665)
  • ParseFloat64 (667-670)
  • ParseString (672-675)
mcp/utils.go (2)
mcp/tools.go (1)
  • CallToolRequest (44-59)
mcp/types.go (1)
  • Params (104-104)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
go.mod (1)

7-7:

✅ Verification successful

New dependency added correctly.

The PR adds github.com/spf13/cast v1.7.1 as a new dependency, which is appropriate for the type conversion functionality being implemented. This dependency is commonly used for converting between various data types in Go.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the cast package version is the latest stable version
curl -s https://api.github.com/repos/spf13/cast/releases/latest | jq -r '.tag_name'

Length of output: 90


Verified: Dependency version confirmed as latest.
The added dependency github.com/spf13/cast v1.7.1 is correct, as confirmed by the latest GitHub release output. No further modifications are needed.

mcp/tools_test.go (1)

245-310: Comprehensive test implementation for new parsing functions.

The test correctly validates the type conversion functionality of all newly added parsing functions by:

  1. Setting up a test CallToolRequest with string representations of various data types
  2. Calling each parsing function and verifying the returned value has the expected type
  3. Including an edge case test with param15 that demonstrates type conversion from string to int64

This is a good example of ensuring the new functionality works as expected before implementation.

mcp/utils.go (3)

599-605: Well-designed argument extraction function with default values.

The ParseArgument function elegantly handles the case where a key doesn't exist in the Arguments map by returning a provided default value. This is a clean implementation that avoids the need for repetitive nil/existence checks in calling code.


607-675: Comprehensive type conversion utilities implemented efficiently.

The implementation provides a complete set of parsing functions for all common Go types (boolean, various integer sizes, floats, and strings). Each function follows the same clear pattern of:

  1. Extracting the argument using the generic ParseArgument function
  2. Converting it to the target type using the appropriate cast package function

This approach is DRY and consistent, which makes the code easy to understand and maintain.


677-680: Added map parsing functionality for more complex use cases.

The ParseStringMap function extends the parsing utilities to handle more complex data structures, providing the same consistent interface as the primitive type parsers. This is a good addition for working with nested JSON structures.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
mcp/utils.go (1)

623-675: Complete the documentation for remaining parsing functions.

While the first two parsing functions have proper GoDoc comments, the remaining functions lack similarly detailed documentation. For consistency and maintainability, all exported functions should have proper documentation.

Add documentation to each function following the pattern established for ParseBoolean and ParseInt64. For example:

+// ParseInt32 extracts and converts an int32 parameter from a CallToolRequest.
+// If the key is not found in the Arguments map, the defaultValue is returned.
+// The function uses cast.ToInt32 for conversion.
 func ParseInt32(request CallToolRequest, key string, defaultValue int32) int32 {
   v := ParseArgument(request, key, defaultValue)
   return cast.ToInt32(v)
 }
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
mcp/utils.go (2)

599-605: Add documentation to the ParseArgument function.

This utility function lacks documentation comments explaining its purpose, parameters, and return values. Since it's the foundational function for all other parsing functions, clear documentation would be beneficial.

+// ParseArgument extracts a value from the Arguments map of a CallToolRequest.
+// If the key is not found, it returns the provided default value.
+// This is a helper function used by the type-specific parsing functions.
 func ParseArgument(request CallToolRequest, key string, defaultVal any) any {

677-699: Consider adding error handling to these parsing functions.

Currently, these functions rely on the cast package's internal error handling, which means conversion errors are silently handled and default values are returned. Consider whether providing error information back to the caller would be beneficial for debugging complex type conversion issues.

An alternative implementation could be:

 // ParseFloat64 extracts and converts a float64 parameter from a CallToolRequest.
-func ParseFloat64(request CallToolRequest, key string, defaultValue float64) float64 {
+// It returns the converted value and any error that occurred during conversion.
+func ParseFloat64(request CallToolRequest, key string, defaultValue float64) (float64, error) {
 	v := ParseArgument(request, key, defaultValue)
-	return cast.ToFloat64(v)
+	return cast.ToFloat64E(v)
 }

This would allow callers to handle conversion errors explicitly if needed. However, this would be a breaking change to the API, so carefully consider whether the trade-off is worth it for your use case.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 29d8725 and 0fe6dbd.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • mcp/utils.go (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
mcp/utils.go (2)
mcp/tools.go (1)
  • CallToolRequest (44-59)
mcp/types.go (1)
  • Params (104-104)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
mcp/utils.go (3)

6-6: Approved dependency addition.

The github.com/spf13/cast package is an appropriate choice for type conversion functionality required by the new parsing functions.


607-621: LGTM: Well-documented parsing functions.

Good job adding detailed GoDoc comments to these functions. They clearly explain the purpose, parameters, and behavior of each function.


599-699: Great implementation of utility functions for parameter parsing.

These parsing functions create a clean abstraction for extracting and converting parameters from CallToolRequest objects. The use of the cast package provides flexible type conversion and the consistent API makes these functions easy to use.

@ezynda3 ezynda3 merged commit 0448984 into mark3labs:main Apr 19, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants