fix: revert 32 falsely marked-complete tasks in TODO.md#616
fix: revert 32 falsely marked-complete tasks in TODO.md#616alex-solovyev merged 2 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
Tasks were marked completed:2026-02-08 without actual work being done. Only t162 remains as completed (real code written in this session). Other tasks may have been done by worker branches but need proper verification before marking done.
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThis PR reopens numerous completed and in-progress backlog items, reverting them from done status back to pending. Multiple task entries across the range transition from completed ( Changes
Estimated Code Review Effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes Possibly Related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @alex-solovyev, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses on enhancing the integrity of the project's task management by correcting erroneous entries in the Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
🔍 Code Quality Report�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status: �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity: 📈 Current Quality Metrics
Generated on: Sun Feb 8 13:58:03 UTC 2026 Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring |
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request reverts 32 tasks in TODO.md that were incorrectly marked as complete. The changes are straightforward and align with the goal of correcting the task tracking status. My review focuses on one point of potential inconsistency: several reverted parent tasks have subtasks that remain marked as complete. This could lead to confusion about the project's status. I've added a comment to address this and suggest a path forward for ensuring the task list remains clear and accurate.
| - [ ] t136.5 Scaffold aidevops-pro and aidevops-anon repos ~2h blocked-by:t136.3,t136.4 | ||
| - Notes: Namespaced plugin architecture (pro.md + pro/) to avoid clashes. Plugin AGENTS.md points to main framework. Minimal CI (local linting only) for private repos. aidevops update deploys main + all plugins. Open questions: license (MIT vs proprietary), Gitea Actions availability, plugin deploy order, subagent index strategy. | ||
| - [x] t135 Codebase Quality Hardening (Opus 4.6 review findings) #plan #quality #hardening → [todo/PLANS.md#2026-02-07-codebase-quality-hardening] ~3d (ai:1.5d test:1d read:0.5d) ref:GH#545 logged:2026-02-07 completed:2026-02-08 | ||
| - [ ] t135 Codebase Quality Hardening (Opus 4.6 review findings) #plan #quality #hardening → [todo/PLANS.md#2026-02-07-codebase-quality-hardening] ~3d (ai:1.5d test:1d read:0.5d) ref:GH#545 logged:2026-02-07 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
While reverting this parent task to incomplete makes sense given the PR's goal, its subtasks on lines 126-128 remain marked as complete. This creates an inconsistent state where a parent task is not done, but its children are.
This pattern appears for other reverted tasks as well:
t131(line 212)t128(line 238)t020(line 296)
To maintain clarity in the task list, consider either:
- Reverting the subtasks to
[ ]as well if they were also marked complete in error. - If the subtasks were genuinely completed, perhaps the parent task's scope needs to be re-evaluated, or a note added to clarify what parts are still pending.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (2)
TODO.md (2)
238-258:⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 CriticalCritical data integrity issue: t128 subtasks marked complete but implementation missing.
All 10 subtasks are marked
[x]completed with detailed implementation notes referencing supervisor-helper.sh (~700 lines) and 9 merged PRs (#376-#381,#384,#392,#494), yet:
- supervisor-helper.sh does not exist in scripts/
- None of the referenced PRs appear in git history
- Parent task t128 is correctly marked
[ ]incomplete, contradicting the completed subtasksEither the subtasks require unmarking as incomplete (if implementation never occurred), or the implementation was deleted without updating TODO.md. Resolve the discrepancy between task status markers and actual codebase state.
212-219:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 MajorCorrect the t131 Notes section—implementations referenced do not exist in codebase.
Verification confirms the contradictory state: the Notes claim "All parts already implemented" and cite
secret-helper.shwith full gopass integration,credentials.shsymlink frommcp-env.sh, and comprehensiveAGENTS.mddocumentation, but these files are absent from the codebase. Only AGENTS.md exists (with 1 gopass reference).The task parent is correctly marked as
[ ](pending), but the Notes section is inaccurate and should be rewritten to reflect actual implementation status. Either the task was falsely marked complete on 2026-02-08, or work was completed on a branch but not merged. Update the Notes to clarify what's actually been implemented vs. what remains pending.
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@TODO.md`:
- Line 67: Update the pending task entry for t153 in TODO.md to remove the
"actual:25m" segment while leaving the rest of the line intact (keep the task id
t153, description, tags like `#feature` `#git` `#tools`, and any other metadata);
locate the string "t153 Create git merge/cherry-pick conflict resolution skill"
and delete only the "actual:25m" token so the task reverts cleanly to a pending
state.
- Line 65: Update the pending task entry for t152 in TODO.md by removing the
"actual:15m" token so the line reads without any actual: time; locate the line
referencing t152 and `((cleaned++))` and strip the `actual:` field (ensure the
"actual:" metadata is only present on completed `[x]` or declined `[-]` tasks
going forward).
- Line 288: In the pending task line for t013 (the markdown entry starting with
"[ ] t013 Image SEO Enhancement with AI Vision"), remove the "actual:25m" token
so the task reflects a pending state; keep the rest of the metadata (ai:25m
test:10m read:10m ref:GH#507 logged:2025-12-21) unchanged and ensure spacing and
punctuation remain valid for the checklist format.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
TODO.md (1)
59-63: Minor markdown formatting issues.Static analysis detected spacing issues:
- Line 59: Spaces inside code span elements
- Line 63: Spaces inside emphasis markers (2 occurrences)
While these don't affect functionality, fixing them maintains markdown consistency.
CodeRabbit correctly flagged that actual: field should only appear on completed [x] tasks, not pending [ ] ones. Removed from t152, t153, t013, t016.
🔍 Code Quality Report�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status: �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity: 📈 Current Quality Metrics
Generated on: Sun Feb 8 14:04:23 UTC 2026 Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring |
|
- AGENTS.md + plans.md: add task completion rules (never mark [x] unless you wrote the code, marking [x] triggers issue auto-close cascade) - issue-sync-helper.sh: cmd_close() now requires verified: field to close issues, --force flag to override (prevents false closure cascade) - supervisor-helper.sh: add Phase 6 verify step - checks PR is merged before marking deliverable as verified - code-quality.yml: add TODO.md validation step on PRs - warns when tasks marked [x] without verified: field Addresses root cause of 38 issues being falsely auto-closed (PR #616).
1 participant
Summary
completed:2026-02-08without actual work doneSummary by CodeRabbit
Note: This update is internal project management only. No changes to the product or user-facing features.