t1305: update upstream streaming hooks issue status and architecture verification#2201
t1305: update upstream streaming hooks issue status and architecture verification#2201marcusquinn merged 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
- Original issue #14691 closed, superseded by #14740 - Active PR #14741 open with unit tests, 6/8 CI checks pass - Added architecture verification: processor.ts location confirmed, v1.2.7 Bun->Filesystem migration does not affect streaming/plugin arch - Clarified anomalyco/opencode (109k, TS) vs opencode-ai/opencode (11k, Go)
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @alex-solovyev, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request refines the documentation for the t1305 OpenCode streaming hooks issue. It provides a detailed update on the upstream development status, including the lifecycle of related issues and pull requests. Additionally, it incorporates an architectural verification to confirm the stability of core components post-migration and clarifies the specific target repository for this feature, enhancing the accuracy and completeness of the project's internal tracking. Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
🔍 Code Quality Report�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status: �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity: 📈 Current Quality Metrics
Generated on: Mon Feb 23 21:22:03 UTC 2026 Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring |
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The pull request updates the upstream issue status and adds an architecture verification section following the v1.2.7 migration. The changes are well-documented and ensure the task remains aligned with the target repository's current state. The suggested minor formatting improvements and noted implementation gap in the code sketch will help maintain the high quality of the documentation.
| ### Timeline | ||
|
|
||
| 1. Issue #14691 created (2026-02-22) with full research, benchmark data, code sketch | ||
| 2. PR #14727 submitted with initial implementation |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For consistency with the other items in the timeline, please add the date for when PR #14727 was submitted.
| - **`processor.ts` location**: Confirmed still in `packages/opencode/src/session/` (TypeScript codebase) | ||
| - **Plugin system**: `packages/plugin/src/index.ts` -- `Plugin.trigger()` pattern unchanged | ||
| - **Streaming loop**: `for await (const value of stream.fullStream)` switch statement in processor.ts | ||
| - **v1.2.1 PartDelta SDK events**: `text-delta`, `reasoning-delta`, `tool-input-delta` events from AI SDK | ||
| - **v1.2.7 migration**: Bun.file() -> Filesystem module (file I/O layer), does NOT affect streaming/plugin architecture | ||
| - **Current version**: v1.2.10 (released 2026-02-20) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The architecture verification section is a great addition. I have a few suggestions for improvement:
- Formatting Consistency: Use backticks for file paths (e.g.,
packages/plugin/src/index.ts), method names (Plugin.trigger()), and event identifiers (text-delta) to match the style in line 242. - Implementation Gap: You've identified
reasoning-deltaas an available event in line 245, and it's included in thestream.deltahook definition (line 95). However, it is currently missing from theprocessor.tscode sketch. Consider adding a case for it in the sketch to ensure completeness.
| - **v1.2.7 migration**: Bun.file() -> Filesystem module (file I/O layer), does NOT affect streaming/plugin architecture | ||
| - **Current version**: v1.2.10 (released 2026-02-20) | ||
|
|
||
| **Note:** There is a separate Go project `opencode-ai/opencode` (11k stars) which is a different product entirely. The target for this task is `anomalyco/opencode` (109k stars, TypeScript). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Repository names should be wrapped in backticks to match the formatting used in the 'Target Repository' section (line 24). Also, consider using 109k+ for the star count to remain consistent with the earlier mention.
2 participants
Summary
Upstream Status
Ref #2129