Skip to content

Update assembly.py #1165

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 25, 2024
Merged

Update assembly.py #1165

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 25, 2024

Conversation

smoothumut
Copy link
Contributor

to get the vedo objects from Group easily, objects property added, and related changes applied

to get the vedo objects from Group easily, objects property added, and related changes applied
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 25, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes to the Group class in vedo/assembly.py enhance object management by introducing a structured objects list. This allows for better handling of objects within a group, correcting existing bugs, and adding functionality such as a new method to retrieve the list of objects. The improvements aim to provide a more reliable and user-friendly interface for users managing groups of objects.

Changes

Files Change Summary
vedo/assembly.py - Introduced self.objects for structured object storage.
- Expanded constructor logic to initialize self.objects from sequences.
- Corrected __iadd__ method to properly append to self.objects.
- Updated clear method to reset self.objects.
- Added objects method to retrieve the list of objects in the group.

Possibly related issues

  • Group objects #1164: The changes address the issue of accessing vedo objects in the Group class, as the new objects method provides a direct way to retrieve them, improving usability over the previous GetParts() method.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d44315e and faeb67e.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • vedo/assembly.py (4 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
vedo/assembly.py (4)

147-147: Fix typo from self.objcects to self.objects.

The correction is necessary for the method to function correctly.

-  self.objcects.append(a)
+  self.objects.append(a)

Ensure that there are no other instances of this typo in the codebase.

Verification successful

Fix typo from self.objcects to self.objects.

The correction is necessary for the method to function correctly. No other instances of this typo were found in the codebase.

  • vedo/assembly.py: Line 147
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify no other instances of `self.objcects` typo in the codebase.

# Test: Search for `self.objcects`. Expect: No matches.
rg --type python $'self.objcects'

Length of output: 63


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify no other instances of `self.objcects` typo in the codebase.

# Test: Search for `self.objcects`. Expect: No matches.
rg 'self.objcects'

Length of output: 79


175-175: LGTM! Verify reset logic.

The update to reset self.objects to an empty list looks good.

However, ensure that all resets of self.objects are consistent with the intended functionality.


203-205: LGTM! Verify method usage.

The new method objects provides a clear interface for accessing the list of objects.

However, ensure that the method is used correctly throughout the codebase.


83-91: LGTM! Verify initialization logic.

The initialization of self.objects and handling of sequences in the constructor look good.

However, ensure that all initializations of self.objects are consistent with the intended functionality.

Verification successful

Initialization of self.objects is consistent.

The initialization of self.objects across the codebase is consistent with the intended functionality observed in the Group class constructor.

  • vedo/assembly.py: Multiple instances show self.objects being initialized as an empty list or directly assigned from sequences.
  • Other files like vedo/pyplot.py, vedo/plotter.py, and vedo/applications.py also show consistent initialization patterns.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all initializations of `self.objects` in the codebase.

# Test: Search for `self.objects` initialization. Expect: Consistent initializations.
rg --type python -A 5 $'self.objects'

Length of output: 67


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all initializations of `self.objects` in the codebase.

# Test: Search for `self.objects` initialization. Expect: Consistent initializations.
rg --type py -A 5 $'self.objects'

Length of output: 8394

@marcomusy marcomusy merged commit a89d2c7 into marcomusy:master Jul 25, 2024
1 check passed
@marcomusy
Copy link
Owner

Thanks Umut!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants