Skip to content

Prevent merging close vertices when converting to Trimesh #1160

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 23, 2024

Conversation

Linus-Foley
Copy link
Contributor

Calling vedo2trimesh() can result in the loss of vertices, as initializing a Trimesh mesh merges close vertices by default (with a tolerance of 1e-8).

Adding process=False prevents this and ensures that the converted mesh does not get altered.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 22, 2024

Walkthrough

The vedo2trimesh function in the vedo/utils.py file has been updated to include a new parameter, process, in its return statement. This enhancement introduces additional configuration options for the construction of the Trimesh object, which may affect mesh data processing or rendering. The overall functionality and control flow of the function remain unchanged, focusing on providing more flexibility in how the mesh is handled.

Changes

File Change Summary
vedo/utils.py Updated vedo2trimesh function to return process=False in addition to existing parameters in its return statement.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
vedo/utils.py (1)

2474-2474: Issue Found: Function calls to vedo2trimesh do not handle the new process parameter

The code changes introduce a new process parameter in the vedo2trimesh function, but the existing function calls do not pass this parameter.

  • File: vedo/utils.py
    • Line: 2474
    • Issue: The call to vedo2trimesh does not pass the process parameter.

Please update all calls to vedo2trimesh to handle the new process parameter correctly.

Analysis chain

LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.

The code changes are approved.

However, ensure that all function calls to vedo2trimesh are updated to handle the new process parameter correctly.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `vedo2trimesh` are updated to handle the new `process` parameter.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature.
rg --type python -A 5 $'vedo2trimesh'

Length of output: 67


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `vedo2trimesh` are updated to handle the new `process` parameter.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature.
rg -t py -A 5 'vedo2trimesh'

Length of output: 679


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Gather more context around the function calls to `vedo2trimesh` to verify the handling of the `process` parameter.

# Test: Search for the function usage with more context. Expect: Detailed occurrences of the function calls.
rg -t py -A 10 'vedo2trimesh'

Length of output: 1089

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2ee8c3c and 2f590af.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • vedo/utils.py (1 hunks)

@marcomusy marcomusy merged commit 17ed74a into marcomusy:master Jul 23, 2024
1 check passed
@marcomusy
Copy link
Owner

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants