-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 130
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Penalize indels more #604
Comments
marcelm
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 23, 2022
This changes the method for choosing the best alignment. While previously, only the number of matches in the alignment counted, with this change, the score of the alignment decides. Scores at the moment are: matches +1, mismatches -1, indels -2 Also, the leftmost alignment is now chosen somewhat more reliably. See #597 Closes #604
marcelm
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 23, 2022
This changes the method for choosing the best alignment. While previously, only the number of matches in the alignment counted, with this change, the score of the alignment decides. Scores at the moment are: matches +1, mismatches -1, indels -2 Also, the leftmost alignment is now chosen somewhat more reliably. See #597 Closes #604
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Indels are enabled by default, but cost the same as mismatches. This often leads to unexpected results, typically longer sequences being trimmed than expected, see #597.
We could penalize indels more, but should also re-consider whether optimizing the number of matches is the best thing to do.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: